A heated dispute has arisen within the government coalition regarding the fate of Petschkov Palace, a historical building infamous for its use as a torture site by the Gestapo during World War II. Eduard Stehlík, chairman of the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes (ÚSTR), supported by members of the ODS party, is advocating for the institute’s headquarters and research facilities to be established within the palace. However, Minister of Trade and Industry Jozef Síkela, representing STAN, strongly opposes the relocation proposal due to the presence of crucial ministry departments currently housed in the palace. The final decision on the matter rests with the government.

The Ministry of Trade and Industry vehemently rejects the idea of relocation, emphasizing the significant role played by Petschkov Palace in housing the foreign trade and European funds sections. According to the ministry’s spokesperson, such a move would not only incur substantial costs but could also jeopardize EU funding disbursement, export license activities, and control over foreign trade in military materials, including weapon deliveries to Ukraine.

Advocates for the relocation, including Member of Parliament Pavel Žáček, stress the historical significance of Petschkov Palace and its symbolic value in representing the suffering endured by the Czech resistance. Žáček argues that other post-communist countries, such as Hungary, the Baltic states, and Ukraine, have successfully transformed former secret service buildings into historical institutions.

While some employees of ÚSTR have resigned in protest, the institute remains committed to staying in Petschkov Palace, citing its unique historical atmosphere. The Ministry of Transport has suggested that ÚSTR consider relocating to a building partially occupied by Czech Railways. However, Transport Minister Martin Kupka acknowledges that finding suitable space will be a challenging task that could take several years.

Member of Parliament Pavel Žáček continues to advocate for the relocation, asserting that the symbolic importance of Petschkov Palace outweighs current bureaucratic considerations. The Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes has not commented on the ongoing negotiations surrounding its headquarters. The issue remains unresolved, leaving the institute’s employees scattered across four different locations. Organizations such as the Czech Chamber of Commerce and the Confederation of Industry and Transport have voiced opposition to the relocation, citing unnecessary expenses and potential disruptions to ongoing efforts to modernize the country.

As the debate rages on, the future of Petschkov Palace hangs in the balance, with historical significance clashing against bureaucratic concerns and practical considerations. The government’s decision will determine the path forward and shape the narrative of remembrance for Czech resistance fighters and their sacrifices.

Article by Prague Forum