The Technical Administration of Roads (TSK) in Prague is grappling with the unexpected partial closure of the iconic Libeň Bridge, unable to provide a precise estimate for the financial burden associated with its support and necessary emergency measures. The recent inspection revealed that load-bearing metal plates crucial for the structure’s functionality have shifted, and concrete support elements are under immense pressure, prompting the partial closure on January 11th.

The bridge, dating back to 1928 and never having undergone repairs, has been a subject of ongoing discussion regarding its deteriorating condition and the need for decisive action. The latest emergency situation and the potential financial implications stem from the prolonged indecision among Prague politicians on whether to repair the bridge or opt for its demolition and the construction of a replica.

The proposed demolition and reconstruction were initially estimated at approximately 600 million crowns in 2018 when advocated by the then Deputy Mayor of Prague for Transport, Petr Dolínek (ČSSD). However, the current cost projection for the preservation and reconstruction of the historical Cubist bridge stands at a staggering 2.1 billion crowns, reflecting the escalation in labor and material costs over the years.

The reluctance to pursue the demolition option has been influenced by the unique historical significance of the Libeň Bridge, a distinctive Cubist architectural gem. The “Do not demolish and expand Libeňák” initiative, supported by Deputy Mayor for Transport Adam Scheinherr (Praha sobě) from 2018 to 2023, argued against the demolition and reconstruction proposal.

The current predicament raises questions about the city’s delayed response to the bridge’s deteriorating technical condition and the potential additional costs incurred due to years of political indecision. As Prague grapples with the pressing need for bridge rehabilitation, a critical decision lies ahead—whether to proceed with costly preservation or opt for a more economically viable but controversial demolition and reconstruction strategy. The outcome will significantly impact both Prague’s infrastructure and the financial burden on taxpayers.

Article by Prague Forum